Ästhetik Als Philosophie der Sinnlichen Erkenntnis Eine Interpretation der ” Aesthetica” A. G. Baumgartens Mit Teilweiser Wiedergabe des Lateinischen Textes. Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten (–), as previously mentioned, introduced the The first volume of his Aesthetica appeared in Aesthetica. by Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten. Publication date Usage Public Domain Mark Topics bub_upload. Publisher Kleyb.

Author: Grojinn Tojataur
Country: Maldives
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 12 May 2005
Pages: 470
PDF File Size: 16.57 Mb
ePub File Size: 16.66 Mb
ISBN: 565-8-20655-180-9
Downloads: 33636
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tugul

Conversely, the fundamental source of disagreeable sentiments is the restriction of our representational activity. Leibniz and by Christian Wolff, a professor and aestheticx philosopher. Beauty is an objective property, founded in the perfection of things, but it is also a relational rather than intrinsic property, for it is attributed to perfection only insofar as there are subjects like us who can perceive it sensorily.

The scream had to be softened to adsthetica sigh, not because screaming betrays an ignoble soul, but because it distorts the features in a disgusting manner. With the development of art as a commercial enterprise linked akexander the rise of a nouveau riche class across Europe, the purchasing of art inevitably led to the question, “what is good art? But in doing so, Shakespeare was in fact doing the same thing as Sophocles:. But they also used the concept of perfection in a more ordinary way, in which some actual objects have specific perfections that others do not, and it is this sense of perfection that Leibniz employed when he stated that.

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten. Everything that leaves our powers in peace when we cognize it baumgartsn a dead cognition. At twenty-one, he became a tutor in the home of a Jewish silk manufacturer, at twenty-five his accountant, subsequently his manager, bamugarten finally a partner in the business, in which he would work full-time for the rest of his life.

In Gottsched’s views, judgments of taste, even if they are not made on the basis of explicit knowledge of objective rules about the perfection of things, track those objective rules when they are in fact correct. Find it on Scholar.

Retrieved from ” https: Mendelssohn’s explicit introduction of the concept of play here, finally, may be just as influential for the development of Kant’s aesthegica as is his insistence that the faculty of approval does not lead to actual knowledge or actual desire. What is important here, finally, is the moral standing of what is contained in the work of art, not the actual morality of the artist himself.

Alexandre Gottlieb Baumgarten, Aesthetica – PhilPapers

To ask other readers questions about Aestheticaplease sign up. He does not need to mention this, perhaps, in the case of the visual arts, since he holds that the visual artist leaves the audience some freedom of imagination by not depicting the moment of the greatest suffering gottlib his subject, and this freedom may afford the necessary distance, but he might have done well to mention it in the case of poetry.


In holding that the real source of our pleasure in beautiful objects is our sensation of our own representational activity Sulzer is led to identify aesthetically valuable forms of sentiment that are not caused by beauty at all.

The painter imitates nature with brush and colors; the musician through beat and harmony; the poet, however, through a discourse that is rhythmic or otherwise well arranged; or, which is much the same, through a harmonious and good-sounding text, which we call a poem. He certainly does, but what he aims to do is to show that the perfections that can be realized in aesthetic experience are both more positive and more complicated than those recognized by Baumgarten.

He should nevertheless be seen as a practicing critic using theoretical developments for his own purposes rather than as a theorist in his own right.

Aesthetica : Scripsit Alexander Gottlieb Bavmgarten

You can make it easier for us to review and, hopefully, publish your contribution by keeping a few points in mind. In fact, Mendelssohn’s analysis of our mixed emotions in the experience of tragedy is even more subtle than this, for a further aspect of it is that our knowledge that we are experiencing represented rather than aleander people gottliev us to enjoy sympathy with the perfections of the noble characters who are aesthetixa rather than pity at their weaknesses or at the fate that overcomes them.

However, although human artistry may concentrate beauty more than nature does, that hardly means that artistic beauty is in all regards superior to natural beauty.

Max Bense – – Agis-Verlag. Baumgarten’s recognition of the perfection of sensible cognition as well as the perfection of what is represented as a distinct source of pleasure in beauty leads him to recognize not just one but in fact three different potential sources of beauty in a work of art: Gottlieeb actually responded directly to Gottsched in a number of polemics, but since his views were based largely—although not entirely—on Baumgarten’s, it will be better to treat them together than to treat Meier now.

Aesthetica : Gottlieb Baumgarten Alexander :

In fact, Herder suggests two different classifications of the arts, and a central challenge in the interpretation of his aesthetics is to see how they are connected. The aim of aesthetics is the perfection of sensible cognition as such, that is, beauty, while its imperfection as such, that is, ugliness, is to be avoided.

Heath – – Theory, Culture and Society 21 6: This is Sulzer’s decisive modification of the Leibnizo-Wolffian approach to aesthetics, not to be found in Baumgarten nor in Baumgarten’s admirer Herder. In Sulzer published a translation of Hume’s first Enquiry concerning Human Understandingand Hume’s theories of the imagination and the moral sentiments, although not his skepticism, would considerably influence the further development of Sulzer’s own philosophy.


Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten

Their idea is that the more imaginative inventions of the poets—the Satan of Milton or the Caliban of Shakespeare rather than the more human heroes of Racine and Corneille admired by Gottsched—make moral truths appear more alive precisely by their attention-grabbing departure from the familiar creatures of the real awsthetica. Inthe same year as he published his Ethicshe was called to a professorship—or more precisely, ordered to accept it—at another Prussian university, in Frankfurt an der Oder.

But for Gottsched a fable is. Vorreden zur Metaphysikp.

While Baumgarten saw himself as only a modest developer of the Wolffian system, and none of his particular views are particularly noteworthy, he nevertheless played an important role in the progression of German philosophy from Leibniz and Wolff to Kant and the later German Idealists. Sulzer also develops a complex theory of the value of fine art. He was working on a revision of it when he was murdered in Trieste in June ofwhile returning to Rome from Vienna, where the Empress Maria Theresa had awarded him a collection of gold and silver medallions.

But we will have to leave these arts aside and conclude our discussion of Herder with a comment on his supposed historical and cultural relativism, which, as was earlier noted, has often been thought to be his central contribution to modern thought. So how does he fit all of these ideas together into his own distinctive theory?

A History of Philosophyvol. But at thirty-one he got a position as a librarian for a nobleman in Dresden, and gained access to the court of the Elector of Saxony, home of one of the great art collections of Europe, and also a Catholic court that ultimately gave him access to Rome.

We should also note here that Wolff identifies order in things with truth. Help us improve this article! It must be joyous when it feels as much as it can.

However, in his classroom lectures on the AestheticaBaumgarten particularly emphasized the moral magnitude of the subject matter of works of art as a major source of our pleasure in them, and there mentions that works of art will therefore be touching, that is to say, emotionally moving. Belonging here are all the perfections of external forms, that is, the lines, surfaces, and bodies and their movements and changes; the harmony of the multiple sounds and colors; the order in the parts of a whole, their similarity, variety, and harmony; their transposition and transformation into other forms; all the capabilities of our soul, all the skills of our body.