Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) The following parameters of voice quality will be rated upon completion of the following tasks. J Voice. Jan pii: S(17) doi: Validity of the Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). 25 Aug Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice ( CAPE-V). Zraick RI(1), Kempster GB, Connor NP, Thibeault S.

Author: Mugar Mazulabar
Country: Equatorial Guinea
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 1 October 2012
Pages: 195
PDF File Size: 17.93 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.81 Mb
ISBN: 458-2-17737-515-4
Downloads: 71421
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vutilar

However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. Assessment practices of Irish speech and language therapists in the evaluation of voice disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. The overall severity parameter had the highest intrarater and inter-reliability values for all the participants.

Didn’t get the message? Generate a file for use with external citation management software. Voice Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester. For all four raters, the differences in the six CAPE-V parameters between the study and the control groups were found to conaensus statistically significant.

The Turkish version of CAPE-V has been proven to be a reliable and valid instrument to use in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice. METHOD Prospective observational study of voice quality ratings of randomized and blinded voice samples was performed.

Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation. Similar Papers Loading similar papers…. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. For the future application of this study, it would be important to investigate whether cepstral measures correlate with the auditory-perceptual consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice cape-v of dysphonia severity collected by a Turkish version of the CAPE-V.


Evaluztion Americleft Speech Project: Does the presence or location of graphic markers affect untrained listeners’ ratings of severity of dysphonia?

The different types of voice disorders, classified as organic and functional disorders, were compared in terms of their CAPE-V scores. Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice. Remote access to EBSCO’s databases is permitted to patrons of subscribing institutions accessing from remote locations for personal, non-commercial use. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners’ judgments of dysphonic voice.

Establishing validity of the consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V)

A Training and Reliability Study. However, remote access to EBSCO’s databases from non-subscribing institutions is not allowed if the purpose of the use is for commercial gain through cost reduction or avoidance for a non-subscribing institution. National Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice cape-v for Biotechnology InformationU. The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized voice quality.

This abstract may be abridged. Showing of 9 extracted citations.

Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).

This study examined the reliability and the empirical validity of the CAPE-V when used by experienced voice clinicians judging normal and disordered voices. Perceptual judgment of hypernasality and audible nasal emission in cleft palate speakers Kerri Downing Listener experience and perception of voice quality. Add to My Bibliography. Please review our privacy policy.


Users should refer to consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice cape-v original published version of the material for the full abstract.

There was no difference found between the organic and functional voice disorders in terms of the CAPE-V scores.

Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice cape-v property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission.

Presentations referencing similar topics. Second, we compared our raters’ judgments of overall severity to capw-v priori consensus judgments of severity for the 59 voices.

Published by Elsevier Inc. Perceptual distances of breathy voice quality: